๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam vs ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $237 (6%); transit is about the same. Relation: Alternative origin port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - North Europe | Asia - North Europe |
| Benchmark | $3,513 | $3,750 |
| Range | $3,162~$3,864 | $2,813~$4,688 |
| Transit | 32-38 days | 33-39 days |
| Basis | K ยฑ10% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $237 lower
- ๐ Basis K (error ยฑ10%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $237 higher
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam and ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam related as alternatives?
Busan โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $237 (6%); transit is about the same. Relation: Alternative origin port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam or ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.