๐PUS Busan โ ๐LCH Laem Chabang vs ๐PUS Busan โ ๐MNL Manila: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Manila has the lower benchmark by $205 (10%). Busan โ Manila is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐LCH Laem Chabang | ๐PUS Busan โ ๐MNL Manila | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - Southeast Asia | Asia - Southeast Asia |
| Benchmark | $2,040 | $1,835 |
| Range | $1,530~$2,550 | $1,376~$2,294 |
| Transit | 7-9 days | 5-7 days |
| Basis | D ยฑ25% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐LCH Laem Chabang
๐ Strengths
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $205 higher
- โณ About 2 days longer in transit
๐PUS Busan โ ๐MNL Manila
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $205 lower
- โก About 2 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐LCH Laem Chabang and ๐PUS Busan โ ๐MNL Manila related as alternatives?
Busan โ Manila has the lower benchmark by $205 (10%). Busan โ Manila is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐LCH Laem Chabang or ๐PUS Busan โ ๐MNL Manila?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.