๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta vs ๐PUS Busan โ ๐SGN Ho Chi Minh: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Ningbo โ Jakarta has the lower benchmark by $798 (48%). Busan โ Ho Chi Minh is about 4 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta | ๐PUS Busan โ ๐SGN Ho Chi Minh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - Southeast Asia | Asia - Southeast Asia |
| Benchmark | $880 | $1,678 |
| Range | $440~$1,320 | $1,259~$2,098 |
| Transit | 9-12 days | 6-8 days |
| Basis | M ยฑ50% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $798 lower
- ๐ Basis M (error ยฑ50%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- โณ About 4 days longer in transit
๐PUS Busan โ ๐SGN Ho Chi Minh
๐ Strengths
- โก About 4 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $798 higher
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta and ๐PUS Busan โ ๐SGN Ho Chi Minh related as alternatives?
Ningbo โ Jakarta has the lower benchmark by $798 (48%). Busan โ Ho Chi Minh is about 4 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
Which is better, ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta or ๐PUS Busan โ ๐SGN Ho Chi Minh?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.