๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) vs ๐PUS Busan โ ๐CHS Charleston: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Charleston has the lower benchmark by $123 (1%). Busan โ New York (NJ) is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) | ๐PUS Busan โ ๐CHS Charleston | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Transpacific - US East & Gulf | Transpacific - US East & Gulf |
| Benchmark | $11,568 | $11,445 |
| Range | $10,411~$12,725 | $8,584~$14,306 |
| Transit | 25-30 days | 27-32 days |
| Basis | K ยฑ10% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ)
๐ Strengths
- โก About 2 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis K (error ยฑ10%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $123 higher
๐PUS Busan โ ๐CHS Charleston
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $123 lower
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- โณ About 2 days longer in transit
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) and ๐PUS Busan โ ๐CHS Charleston related as alternatives?
Busan โ Charleston has the lower benchmark by $123 (1%). Busan โ New York (NJ) is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) or ๐PUS Busan โ ๐CHS Charleston?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.