๐PUS Busan โ ๐ANR Antwerp vs ๐SHA Shanghai โ ๐RTM Rotterdam: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Antwerp has the lower benchmark by $15 (0%). Shanghai โ Rotterdam is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐ANR Antwerp | ๐SHA Shanghai โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - North Europe | Asia - North Europe |
| Benchmark | $3,600 | $3,615 |
| Range | $2,700~$4,500 | $3,254~$3,977 |
| Transit | 33-39 days | 31-37 days |
| Basis | D ยฑ25% | W ยฑ10% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐ANR Antwerp
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $15 lower
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- โณ About 2 days longer in transit
๐SHA Shanghai โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- โก About 2 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis W (error ยฑ10%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $15 higher
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐ANR Antwerp and ๐SHA Shanghai โ ๐RTM Rotterdam related as alternatives?
Busan โ Antwerp has the lower benchmark by $15 (0%). Shanghai โ Rotterdam is about 2 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐ANR Antwerp or ๐SHA Shanghai โ ๐RTM Rotterdam?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.