๐SAN Santos โ ๐RTM Rotterdam vs ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Kaohsiung โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $845 (18%). Santos โ Rotterdam is about 18 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative origin port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐SAN Santos โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Transatlantic and Emerging Markets | Asia - North Europe |
| Benchmark | $4,595 | $3,750 |
| Range | $2,757~$6,433 | $2,813~$4,688 |
| Transit | 16-20 days | 33-39 days |
| Basis | S ยฑ40% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐SAN Santos โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- โก About 18 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis S (error ยฑ40%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $845 higher
๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $845 lower
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- โณ About 18 days longer in transit
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐SAN Santos โ ๐RTM Rotterdam and ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam related as alternatives?
Kaohsiung โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $845 (18%). Santos โ Rotterdam is about 18 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative origin port.
Which is better, ๐SAN Santos โ ๐RTM Rotterdam or ๐KHH Kaohsiung โ ๐RTM Rotterdam?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.