๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) vs ๐HAM Hamburg โ ๐NYC New York: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Hamburg โ New York has the lower benchmark by $8,443 (73%). Hamburg โ New York is about 15 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative origin port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) | ๐HAM Hamburg โ ๐NYC New York | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Transpacific - US East & Gulf | Transatlantic and Emerging Markets |
| Benchmark | $11,568 | $3,125 |
| Range | $10,411~$12,725 | $2,344~$3,906 |
| Transit | 25-30 days | 11-14 days |
| Basis | K ยฑ10% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ)
๐ Strengths
- ๐ Basis K (error ยฑ10%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $8,443 higher
- โณ About 15 days longer in transit
๐HAM Hamburg โ ๐NYC New York
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $8,443 lower
- โก About 15 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) and ๐HAM Hamburg โ ๐NYC New York related as alternatives?
Hamburg โ New York has the lower benchmark by $8,443 (73%). Hamburg โ New York is about 15 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative origin port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐NYC New York (NJ) or ๐HAM Hamburg โ ๐NYC New York?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.