๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam vs ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HAM Hamburg: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $42 (1%); transit is about the same. Relation: Alternative destination port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam | ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HAM Hamburg | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - North Europe | Asia - North Europe |
| Benchmark | $3,513 | $3,555 |
| Range | $3,162~$3,864 | $2,666~$4,444 |
| Transit | 32-38 days | 33-39 days |
| Basis | K ยฑ10% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $42 lower
- ๐ Basis K (error ยฑ10%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐HAM Hamburg
๐ Strengths
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $42 higher
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam and ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HAM Hamburg related as alternatives?
Busan โ Rotterdam has the lower benchmark by $42 (1%); transit is about the same. Relation: Alternative destination port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐RTM Rotterdam or ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HAM Hamburg?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.