๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong vs ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Ningbo โ Jakarta has the lower benchmark by $615 (41%). Busan โ Haiphong is about 4 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong | ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - Southeast Asia | Asia - Southeast Asia |
| Benchmark | $1,495 | $880 |
| Range | $1,121~$1,869 | $440~$1,320 |
| Transit | 5-7 days | 9-12 days |
| Basis | D ยฑ25% | M ยฑ50% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong
๐ Strengths
- โก About 4 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $615 higher
๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $615 lower
- ๐ Basis M (error ยฑ50%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- โณ About 4 days longer in transit
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong and ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta related as alternatives?
Ningbo โ Jakarta has the lower benchmark by $615 (41%). Busan โ Haiphong is about 4 days shorter in transit. Relation: Corridor in the same region.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong or ๐NGB Ningbo โ ๐JKT Jakarta?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.