๐PUS Busan โ ๐JKT Jakarta vs ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong: 2026 Benchmarks and Alternatives
Compare published benchmarks and conditions of two corridors or two carriers.
๐ At a glance
Busan โ Haiphong has the lower benchmark by $880 (37%). Busan โ Haiphong is about 6 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
2026 GLOBAL FREIGHT DOSSIER
Global Freight Benchmark Dossier ยท November 2026 edition
100 corridors with error ranges and a 150-company directory. PDF in English and Korean. Order by bank wire with an invoice.
๐ Side-by-side table
| ๐PUS Busan โ ๐JKT Jakarta | ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Asia - Southeast Asia | Asia - Southeast Asia |
| Benchmark | $2,375 | $1,495 |
| Range | $1,781~$2,969 | $1,121~$1,869 |
| Transit | 10-13 days | 5-7 days |
| Basis | D ยฑ25% | D ยฑ25% |
๐ Strengths / โ ๏ธ Points to watch
๐PUS Busan โ ๐JKT Jakarta
๐ Strengths
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
- ๐ธ Benchmark is $880 higher
- โณ About 6 days longer in transit
๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong
๐ Strengths
- ๐ฐ Benchmark is $880 lower
- โก About 6 days shorter in transit
- ๐ Basis D (error ยฑ25%)
โ ๏ธ Points to watch
โ Frequently Asked Questions
How are ๐PUS Busan โ ๐JKT Jakarta and ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong related as alternatives?
Busan โ Haiphong has the lower benchmark by $880 (37%). Busan โ Haiphong is about 6 days shorter in transit. Relation: Alternative destination port.
Which is better, ๐PUS Busan โ ๐JKT Jakarta or ๐PUS Busan โ ๐HPH Haiphong?
Price or transit alone does not decide it. Look at transshipment, terminals, sailing schedule, inland haulage and whether the carrier serves your lane, and confirm with written quotations.
Where do the figures in this comparison come from?
They are based on indices and public documents published up to 6 November 2026 (Drewry WCI, KCCI and others), shown with a basis grade and error range. The source list is in the dossier.